「List of Bitcoin mining ASICs」を編集中

|warning=needinfo,21, formerly 21e6, is believed to use their own developed chip given their staff. Little public information about the hardware used is known. On the 18th of May, 2015, 21 Inc. announced that they will be providing development kits of a BitShare chip to interested parties with the intent of their chip to be used in embedded applications.<ref>https://medium.com/@21dotco/a-bitcoin-miner-in-every-device-and-in-every-hand-e315b40f2821</ref>

|notes=The letters 'BE' in the component name/markings stands for "Block Erupter". ASICMiner considers the BE100 their 'Gen1' product.

|notes=ASICMiner considers this their 'Gen3' product. Was made available in 8x8mm and 9x9mm packages.

|notes=This was a prototype manufactured on an [[wikipedia:Multi-project wafer service|MPW]]. The package appears to be soldered on only 2 sides, which may imply that internally there are also only bond wires to those two sides.

|notes=ASICMiner would consider this their 'Gen4' product. The expected hashing performance and package size is preliminary.

|notes=Only produced in a limited run, as ASICrising opted against making a full mask while their 28nm design was close to being finalized.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=719143.msg8334447#msg8334447</ref>. Package size is an estimate based on neighboring components.

|notes=Third hash rate listed is based on Gh/mm² numbers using the 100Gh as the base value. This was also used to derive the die size for further calculations.

|sources=specs/node size/Global Foundries/RacyICs<ref>https://asicrising.de/wolfblood-xe/</ref>. Gh/mm²<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=719143.msg8255622#msg8255622</ref>

|notes=BitFury Group considers this their Gen 1, Rev 1 product.<br />It was originally designed at 65nm but die-shrunk down to 55nm<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677.msg2408831#msg2408831</ref>.<br />It was widely released in at least 3 different packages/markings: The 'beta' / 5Ghash (estimated hash rate before practical tests) markings on a sawn package, BioInfoBank and CCCP markings on a punched package.<br />High efficiency claims were made by BitFury<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=183368.msg2499516#msg2499516</ref> that at this time seem unrealistic. BitcoinTalk user vs3 holds a large collection of technical information about this chip in his NanoFury repository<ref>https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury/wiki/The-missing-bitfury-chip-documentation</ref>

|notes=BitFury Group considers this their Gen 5 product. Date is public announcement of tape-out date.

|warning=canceled,Along with an IPO, BTCGARDEN's 40nm endeavours were canceled.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=264696.msg2914929#msg2914929</ref> BTCGARDEN would then go on to use ASICMiner's BE200 40nm chip in mining products.<ref>http://www.btcgarden.com/product</ref>

|notes=ASIC based on their FPGA design. The first publicly known to exist Bitcoin ASIC.

|notes=Although the MCM package shows 4 dies, only 3 are active silicon.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=300469.msg3221155#msg3221155</ref> Die size is thus based on 2*10x10mm

|notes=This chip can perform SHA256(d) and Scrypt calculations. The performance figures are strictly for the SHA256(d) portion.<br />The 'GC' in the product code stands for 'Gridchip'<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=355268.0</ref>.<br />See also: GridChip, SFARDS.

|notes=Date is initial design start date. Plans of this chip were revealed in HashFast's bankruptcy case. Although listed here under HashFast Technologies, the IP rights lay with DXCorr.<ref>http://hashfast.org/14-30725.156.pdf page 8</ref>

|notes=Date is initial design start date. Plans of this chip were revealed in HashFast's bankruptcy case.<ref>http://hashfast.org/14-30725.148.pdf page 200</ref> Development of this chip began after 'generation 2.0' was canceled.<ref>http://hashfast.org/14-30725.148.pdf page 212</ref>

|warning=vaporware,A next chip was mentioned<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=455332.msg5018212#msg5018212</ref>, and in a private message to [[User:TheRealSteve|TheRealSteve]], iCoinTech noted that there were unexpected delays. No new information has since surfaced, and it may have been canceled.

|notes= Package size is an estimate based on neighboring components.

|warning=future,Plans for this chip have been announced<ref>http://www.weibo.com/1064916230/Ce24u30D8?from=page_1005051064916230_profile&wvr=6&mod=weibotime</ref> and claimed to have been taped out<ref>http://www.weibo.com/p/1001603853993762805988</ref>. Any specifications are highly subject to change.

|warning=needinfo,Other than website claims no information on this chip is available. Some BitcoinTalk posts suggest the design did not originate entirely with MegaBigPower.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=140366.msg10182965#msg10182965</ref>

|notes=This chip can perform SHA256(d) and Scrypt calculations. The performance figures are strictly for the SHA256(d) portion.<br />Die size is silicon area (10.56x10.52mm)<br />Date is tape-out date.<br />See also: GridChip, GridSeed.

|notes=Date is claimed tape-out date. Gh/s performance is based on claimed clock frequency and number of hashing engines. Claimed to incorporate / be built around an ARM Cortex M3 core.

|warning=canceled,Project appears to have been canceled, no new information since December 12th, 2013<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=354426.msg3794135#msg3794135</ref>. Developer's behavior became erratic.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=350013.msg3776410#msg3776410</ref><ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=522390.msg5786100#msg5786100</ref>

''Note: Most links below will lead to external sites. Icons have been suppressed to prevent link clutter.''

|warning=needinfo,Claimed to have been pursuing their own chip according to Jeff Garzik<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=269730.msg2891405#msg2891405</ref>. Alydian filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy on November 1st, 2013<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=325484.0</ref>, only 3 months after being founded by CoinLab. As part of their bankruptcy proceedings, asset auctions were blocked as the judge believed to be dealing with "a debtor that has absolutely zero existence"<ref>http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303465004579325064077902306</ref>

|notes=Implied to have been BTC Olympus' first ASIC<ref>https://archive.today/wkC3o#msg3881626</ref>. Not to be confused with Achilles Labs, a manufacturer of Scrypt mining hardware.

|warning=needinfo,This chip was to be used in a product called the Poseidon<ref>https://archive.today/wkC3o#msg3881626</ref>, for which at least one BitcoinTalk Forum post exists claiming selling a used unit<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=561122</ref>. However, no details of the unit or chip are available and the company is generally regarded as being dishonest in their business.<ref>http://cointelegraph.com/news/111640/disreputable_company_claims_5_th_rate_mining_rig</ref>. {{as of|2015|03|27}}, all social media accounts/posts have been closed, and on March 21st, 2015, the first post in the relevant BitcoinTalk Forum thread has been blanked out.

|warning=scam,This company attempted to market mining hardware that was claimed to use their own chips - however the hardware even on paper was highly inefficient and overpriced (being sold by pre-order) by the time it was announced. At one point the company suggested free units for review by interested parties as long as they would post immediate review threads on BitcoinTalk. This has since been regarded as an attempt to bolster credibility. The company's website is no longer in operation and BitcoinTalk forum accounts inactive.

|warning=scam,Canceled January 29th, 2014<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=429513.msg4825122#msg4825122</ref> due to scam allegations and the project being “far too big [,,] to handle”. Used manipulated image of a Handshake Solutions ARM996HS processor<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=429513.msg4825122#msg4825122</ref> to bolster credibility. Pre-orders were refunded, with {{{subst:BTC}}}0.0998 ($8 at the time) unaccounted for.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=432716.msg10976689#msg10976689</ref>

|warning=scam,Unknown status, generally presumed to have been dishonest in their (crowdfunding pitch) presentation<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=680050</ref>. Promotional image<ref>https://bitcoingalaxy.us/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/14nm-ASIC-mining-chips-the-future.png</ref> actually used a 4xKlondike K16 case design<ref>https://i.imgur.com/KIx6WYol.png</ref>

|warning=needinfo,The mining equipment this chip is going to be used in was originally slated for Q1 2015. {{As of|2015|04|01}} the HashCoins website reads that this equipment "is in the stage of testing and certification", while taking orders via Bitcoin and/or bank transfers.

|notes=Hashra has traditionally used existing hardware, reselling these 'as is' or in custom cases. The chip used in the Moonraker product may well be a pre-existing chip of unstated origin. At least one party noted that {{as of|2014|09|09}}, the chips should exist<ref>https://hashtalk.org/topic/4002/manebjorn-s-miner-wishlist-for-reviews</ref>

|warning=needinfo,{{As of|2015|09|07}}, this hardware is purportedly still under development - after numerous delays, despite taking orders. A BitcoinTalk scam accusation thread details several claimed excuses<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=822750</ref>.

|notes=Date was projected tape-out date. Design based on [[FPGA Mining|open source FPGA design]]<ref>http://www.labcoin.com/presentation.html</ref>

|warning=scam,This chip was claimed to have been received<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263445.msg3034290#msg3034290</ref>, however the image was found to be manipulated<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263445.msg3116166#msg3116166</ref> which was explained as just being rough chip packaging<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263445.msg3116299#msg3116299</ref>. Another image with the alleged chip in a tray rather than on a reel was posted<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263445.msg3148974#msg3148974</ref> accompanied by an infeasible PCB design.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263445.msg3152956#msg3152956</ref>

|warning=scam,Used manipulated images<ref>http://bitcoinminingcenter.com/wp-content/themes/hyperion/images/slideshow/slide3.png</ref><ref>http://bitcoinminingcenter.com/wp-content/themes/hyperion/images/slideshow/slide4.png</ref> of G-Technology G-Safe and G-Speed products<ref>http://support.g-technology.com/support/g-safe</ref><ref>http://www.g-technology.com/products/g-speed-es-4-hard-drive-failsafe-raid-16-tb</ref>, is generally presumed to have been dishonest in their presentation and (pre)sales<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=365585</ref>. Company logo is actually that of [[wikipedia:Phoenix Television|Phoenix Television]]<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=268180.msg2922218#msg2922218</ref>

|warning=needinfo,Other than old website claims (available through archive.org) no information on this chip is available. Company supposedly sold hardware incorporating this chip by pre-order for a July 2014 delivery. PeerNova had acquired HighBitCoin, a claimed ASIC designer.<ref>http://www.coindesk.com/overstock-venture-capital-investment-bitcoin-peernova/</ref>

|notes=Also known as BitAsic^{[http://bitasic.com/ www]}. Current BitAsic website suggests a product called Enigma which should not be confused with the Bitcoin Ultra^{[http://www.bitcoinultra.co.uk/ www]} Enigma, which used InnoSilicon/Coincraft A1 chips.

|warning=scam,Used images of AMD Radeon 295x2 systems and boards portraying them as Bitcoin mining hardware.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1113713</ref>. {{As of|2015|07|10}} the website has been blanked with the message "Thanks for the lot of advice in the Bitcointalk Forum, we will back with a better product. :)"

|warning=needinfo,Little is known about this chip outside of its purported use in hardware that could be rented (early cloudhashing). No page appears to have details (the now-defunct website mentioned a 30-day delay in tape-out<ref>http://www.kuangjibi.com/news/delay</ref>), and the validity of the company's claims have been called into question.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=270211</ref>

|notes=The conflicting efficiency data stems from claimed efficiency in text versus apparent efficiency as shown on a purported miner display. Both are at-the-wall.

|notes=It is currently not known if the chip claimed is of their own design. Hash rate and efficiency are derived from 'M20' hardware claims. Date is first appearance of company's website, chips are claimed to be expected Q4 2015.

|warning=needinfo,This company is the subject of several scam allegations at BitcoinTalk. The hardware which is claimed to incorporate this chip is only available for pre-order with delivery planned for January 2016.